[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Debian linux-image-2.6.32-4-xen-amd64 2.6.32-11 doesn't boot with > 4 GiB; resets immediatelly, no log messages


  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:20:33 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 18:20:03 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b=uiZ Y6VZunI9/Z5yGj9vkNCyL4sLjud2xkbEPCN8Hiogc1VkxnagTMymYsx+hg1G3G64 FXn63ewbsZ97zh7SAsZqX5jlqnUiJ3Xv5rJ0J5o/iJEsKhyehOke8te0R6Pr1VPR KBnWLIRs2CsSbxz9jEkUpExiHZeeC36+Nwe79HnA=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Openpgp: id=98EF9A49

Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 02:49 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> Excellent.
>>>     
>> Could this be also the reason why I had very funky memory management
>> (eg: some RAM missing between "xm list" and "xm info")?
>>   
> 
> I don't think so.  Before I added the "unused memory freeing" code, then
> you'd see memory assigned to a domain that the domain itself couldn't
> use, and so it was effectively wasted.  With the memory-freeing in
> place, the "xm list" and the domain's internal view of memory should be
> basically the same.
> 
> Either way, it shouldn't have any effect on the global memory accounting
> shown by xm info.
> 
>     J

Then do you have an idea why "xm info" shows a bit more, 900 MB free /
3990 MB total, while "xm list" shows only a 2048 dom0 running??? I'm not
talking about just few bytes here, but one third of my RAM gone ...
What's going on?

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.