[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: CPU offlining patch xen-unstable:21049
On 15/04/2010 09:50, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think the try_lock is not for the cpu_down(). The point is, if another CPU > is trying the get the lock. > > Considering following scnerio: > 1) cpu_down() in CPU A, and get the xenpf_lock, then call to > stop_machine_run(), trying to bring all CPU to stop_machine_run context. > 2) At the same time, another vcpu in CPU B do a xenpf hypercall, and try to > get the xenpf_lock. If ther is no retyr for this lock, it can't get > xenpf_lock, it will never go to the softirq > So the system will hang. > > Hope this make thing clear. But CPU A doesn't hold the xenpf_lock when it calls stop_machine_run(). It dropped it before cpu_down() got invoked, because that gets executed via continue_hypercall_on_cpu(). -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |