Re: [Xen-devel] regression with c/s 21223

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 07/05/2010 04:36, "Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Frankly, I'm not sure how best to handle this case.  The current
> philosophy seems to be treat all 'tap:foo' devices as blktap2 (see c/s
> 19874 - author cc'd), but fall back to blktap1 if blktap2 is not found
> when domU is started.  I'm certainly having problems differentiating
> between the two in to_sxp().
> 
> Any suggestions on how to prevent the bug reported in [1] without this
> new regression?

Way outside my comfort zone with xend I'm afraid. Do you think we need
explicit differentiation between tap and tap2?

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel