Re: [Xen-devel] Sixth (and final?) release candidate for Xen 3.4.3

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 05/07/2010 12:10 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 07/05/2010 03:03, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   
>>> Hm, there were changes to 3.4.3 to make it work better with pv_ops
>>> dom0 kernels. I'm thinking things like xen-3.4-testing:19862 and
>>> 19863. I suggest you post more details and you should get help from
>>> pv_ops people (I cc'ed a couple of them :-). They may be able to tell
>>> you straight off whether your pv_ops kernel is too
>>> old/new/weird/whatever, for example.
>>>       
>> As I know, you have to backport extra Csets like 28089, 21092, and 21161 from
>> xen-unstable.hg to make it work well with latest pv_ops kernel except the
>> Csets Keir had indicated.
>>     
> Doesn't sound like 3.4.3 is going to support pv_ops then.
>   

Florian and M A Young have reported success with 3.4.3-rc, so it isn't
completely non-functional.  How essential are those changes?   28089
doesn't appear in my tree ("abort: unknown revision '28089'"), but 21092
("Allow all unused GSI to be configured via IO-APIC by new pv_ops dom0")
and 21161 ("Make c/s 21089 work again with c/s 21092") both look pertient.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel