[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/11] __setup_vector_irq: handle NULL chip_data
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 03:20:46PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 2 ++ > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > index 96f6bba..976646f 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > @@ -1287,6 +1287,8 @@ void __setup_vector_irq(int cpu) > > /* Mark the inuse vectors */ > > for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) { > > cfg = desc->chip_data; > > + if (!cfg) > > + continue; > > if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cfg->domain)) > > continue; > > vector = cfg->vector; > > Most curious. This looks be fixed upstream: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/4/30/458 > > Do you know why the chip_data isn't set? > I think is the VIRQ_TIMER handler that doesn't have any chip_data: xen_setup_timer -> bind_virq_to_irqhandler -> find_unbound_irq -> dynamic_irq_init here chip_data is set to NULL. After that we call set_irq_chip_and_handler_name that set desc->chip but not desc->chip_data. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |