[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?

To: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 23:41:25 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:42:03 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, 28 May 2010, Dulloor wrote:
> If we are to add new guest configuration parameters, is it enough to
> make it work with xl ?
> Sorry, if I missed any past mails regarding this, but (in general)
> should people think xl or xm or both ?

xl is strongly recommended at this point.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?
  - From: Dulloor

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Null-pointer access in netback_uevent
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xc: deal with xen/evtchn and xen/gntdev device names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.