[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 11:20:48 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 03:22:01 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?"):
> On Fri, 28 May 2010, Dulloor wrote:
> > If we are to add new guest configuration parameters, is it enough to
> > make it work with xl ?
> > Sorry, if I missed any past mails regarding this, but (in general)
> > should people think xl or xm or both ?
> 
> xl is strongly recommended at this point.

Indeed.  I think at this point it's probably OK to submit features for
libxl only and not add them to xm/xend too.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?
  - From: Vincent, Pradeep

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Fix cpu hotplug bug of mtrr update inconsistency
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: XenWiki Xen 4.0 Tutorials for Ubuntu 10.04
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] [PVOPS] fix gntdev on PAE
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] New feature support - xl or xm ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.