Re: [Xen-devel] why xenstore-* hangs if xenstored is not started

[Yu Zhiguo <yuzg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Vincent,

Vincent Hanquez wrote:
>>
>> Thanks~~
>> I confirmed the task is at D+ and there are no this "problem" if use
>> option -s.
>> But I think S+ is better than D+...
> 
> I don't think it's very easy to have interruptible sleep here, it would
> change radically the protocol. the kernel xenstored page need to be
> handled "atomically" since requests and their replied cannot be
> intertwined. Maybe a timeout would be the one requiring the less change ?
> 

 I'm not familiar with those code and not sure how can fix it,
but I think a timeout is better than doing nothing.


-- 
Regards
Yu Zhiguo


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel