[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-unstable save error
On 06/22/2010 12:01 PM, Keir Fraser wrote: Keir, I don't think so since the hypervisor datetime in /boot is the same like for kernel and tools.On 22/06/2010 07:48, "Jan Beulich"<JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 22.06.10 at 08:23, Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Jan, as we were solving this with Keir on the list I was unable to save the HVM guest properly and reverting your c/s 21615 helped and with your patch reverted it was working fine. Any idea why there were so type failures for all the pages of HVM guest?Not really, and I think you will need to find out by instrumenting the hypercall implementation (XEN_DOMCTL_getpageframeinfo{2,3}) - really, type failures should only happen for grant frames and I/O memory pages (as you can see in the code, for the function to report XTAB either the MFN must be invalid, must be a Xen frame, or it must be impossible to obtain a reference to the page - all of which shouldn't hold for the majority of a HVM guest's pages).Michal, is it possible you are running new tools against a slightly older hypervisor? The tools changes had a corresponding, non-version-checked, modification to a hypercall. Without running the modified hypervisor, HVM save would indeed behave very oddly! -- Keir Michal -- Michal Novotny<minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx>, RHCE Virtualization Team (xen userspace), Red Hat _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |