Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: make libxl_wait_for_device_model not racy

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 23/06/10 14:15, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> No, it was just refactoring.
>
> Are you sure that both xenstore implementations always do that?
>    
yes.

> Is this a "feature" we can safely rely on?
>    
yes. this feature has been here since xenstore has watches, for this 
exact purpose: not having to check before the watch fire that the values 
you're expecting is there already.
--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel