[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2 control function (version 2)

  • To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: eXeC001er <execooler@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:47:11 +0400
  • Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:48:29 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=F4HWPBjNVUvVyQIDHEsQMwsesBLaFQcILxNC1MpFB+Oelg805cU0MxX39zAo3d5Wq3 ORw7b9Q32lhmccU+x6+gDRUYa3scIzFgB16MlfXZcvOPkHtNjSvTxz/wmE+Qcv3KPyJQ BzK2HCeR/nbkMh7s1pXpgqSkZTZ1zuXsYBVDQ=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
ÂWhen it rolled back the changes?

2010/6/29 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 29/06/2010 14:59, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Does that mean that xen-unstable needs fixing too ? ÂI'd rather apply
>> a change to xen-unstable first and test it there.
>>
>> xen-unstable have my previous patch, but it can lead to regression (if use
>> 'tap:xxx' instead Â'tap:tapdisk:xxx')
>
> Should we revert your previous patch while we discuss it ?

I reverted it from xen-4.0-testing already for obvious reasons. I think it
makes sense to do so in xen-unstable too (via your tree) and then re-start
from a clean slate in all trees.

Â-- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.