[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/6] trace: improve check_tbuf_size()

To: "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:20:19 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:22:29 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>>> On 30.06.10 at 17:15, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As long as we're being anal, we should be sure to use the actual types
> from prod and cons to do the check.  Patch attached.

Okay - I didn't want to go that far, but it's fine by me.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] trace: improve check_tbuf_size()
  - From: Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/6] trace: improve check_tbuf_size()
  - From: George Dunlap

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/6] trace: adjust printk()s
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/6] trace: fix T_INFO_FIRST_OFFSET
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/6] trace: improve check_tbuf_size()
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/6] trace: adjust printk()s
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.