[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] user-land tool for memory paging and memory sharing
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 11:39:15AM -0700, Patrick Colp wrote: > I've never tried the sharing code, so I can't speak for it. For > swapping, it's only for HVM guests, however as far as I know, you can > currently only page out one guest at a time (this is clearly something > that we'd like to fix, although this is likely to happen after the new > mem-event interface is established). In theory with swapping, you can > remove most of the guest's allocated memory, however the more pages > that are swapped out, the slower it runs. Grzegorz should be able to > provide more information about sharing. > Does this thread help?: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-04/msg00373.html -- Pasi > > Patrick > > > On 29 June 2010 11:34, Ky Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > >>>> On 6/29/2010 at 1:37 PM, in message > > <AANLkTikTMxl8PncfXcOGKBphVvGW6_lNhdP1M_qPUsjX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Patrick Colp > > <pjcolp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> I'm not aware of any formal documentation on either of these things. > >> > >> I would imagine that there are still some issues with both sharing and > >> paging that may not make it suitable for enterprise use. Of course, if > >> anybody would like to stress test them in "real-world" scenarios and > >> report any problems encountered (or patches), that would be greatly > >> appreciated. Certainly with the upcoming changes to the mem-event > >> interface, there are likely to be new bugs/issues introduced as well, > >> so it would seem reasonable to not want to rely too much on either > >> feature until that is a bit more solidified. > > > > Thanks Patric. I am interested in testing these features and I was looking > > for some documentation to get me started here. Is there a known list of > > problems/shortcomings in the code as it stands today. Is this feature only > > for HVM guests? In your tests, what levels of memory over-commitment were > > you able to achieve. > > > > Regards, > > > > K. Y > >> > >> > >> On 29 June 2010 10:11, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> +1... and in fact, my earlier question was never answered > >>> so let me ask it more bluntly... > >>> > >>> Do these features work reliably today on 4.0.x, e.g. well > >>> enough for an enterprise environment rather than just > >>> as a demo? Or are there known features/corner cases > >>> that are missing today (that the discussion on mem-event > >>> is perhaps intended eventually to rectify)? > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: Ky Srinivasan [mailto:ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx] > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:58 AM > >>>> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] user-land tool for memory paging and memory > >>>> sharing > >>>> > >>>> Is there any documentation on these features. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> > >>>> K. Y > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Xen-devel mailing list > >>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |