[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 1] mini-os: PV fronted MUST be in XenbusStateConnected not XenbusStateInitialized during init
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 12:32:15PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Thank you for the patch Konrad. > > > > I think this fix shows us that 805ed3b20492d2f4bb465bfda65cedd286e23209 > > was the wrong fix: > > > > commit 805ed3b20492d2f4bb465bfda65cedd286e23209 > > Author: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Fri May 21 15:46:55 2010 +0100 > > > > Wait for frontend state Connected before connecting the backend > > > > The frontend of the framebuffer set a value > > (request-abs-pointer) and go > > to the state Connected. The backend must read this value > > only when the > > frontend has the state Connected. > > > > > > The problem was that the backend can be sure that the linux xenfb > > frontend wrote request-abs-pointer only after the frontend state is > > Connected. > > In order to do that properly we need a new hook in qemu xen_backend: we > > should probably rename the current connect hook to initialise and create > > a new connect hook that would be implemented by xenfb to read > > request-abs-pointer. > > Uhh. How about a compromise. Lets put this hac^H^H^Hpatch in, and when the > QEMU > fix is ready, yank this out and also the c/s 21260: > > "mini-os: Revert 21106:b20f897d6010 "Fix xenbus initialisation" > > Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@xxxxxxxx) reports that this fixes > HVM+stubdom." > > which was fixing the same exact problem I did, but on the stubdomain > side? > What you suggested, or we just revert 805ed3b20492d2f4bb465bfda65cedd286e23209 right now and wait for a proper fix for that. Ian, what do you think? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |