RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen

[Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Stefano --

What versions of Xen are compatible with this series?
I.e. is 4.0 required?  Are all Xen-side changes in
official 4.0.0?  Or only in 4.0-testing (and therefore
will be in 4.0.1)?  Or only in xen-unstable?

If post-4.0.0 xen changes are necessary, could you point
out the changesets?

Thanks,
Dan

P.S. Sorry if I missed earlier discussion or documentation
on this... but if not otherwise documented, maybe the
info should be in the patch comment?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 5:39 AM
> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Cc: Fitzhardinge; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Stefano Stabellini; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Don Dutile; Sheng Yang
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/12] PV on HVM Xen
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 05:12:20PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > this is another update on the PV on HVM Xen series; a list of
> changes
> > > compared to the previous version follows:
> >
> > Can you use the [v4] in the main patch (this is the fourth version of
> > these patches, right?)? I am getting confused as to which version I
> am
> > reviewing and if I've missed one or what not.
> >
> > And in this first intro email state:
> >
> > Since v7 the following things have changed:
> >  - Konrad made some comments.
> >  - etc.
> >
> 
> Good point, I'll do that from now on.
> I am pretty sure that you are reviewing the latest version I sent.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel