Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

--text follows this line--
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API 
cleanup"):
> I think Vincent wanted a different API to make memory accounting easier.

Right.

> What about extending the current create_device_model API with a
> more explicit stubdom flag, and a way to return the stubdom domid to the
> caller?
> 
> Also the caller should be able to know in advance the amount of memory
> used for the stubdom: another libxl function could be added for that
> purpose.
> 
> Would that interface be flexible enough for you?

That would address my concerns.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel