[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 9] libxl: return libxl_dominfo from libxl_event_get_domain_death_info
On Mon, 2010-07-26 at 17:38 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 9] libxl: return > libxl_dominfo from libxl_event_get_domain_death_info"): > > enum alone would OK, but most header files contains other stuff as well, > > so including features.h would be fine but including platform.h would not. > > In order to have a clear policy we should just say that including Xen > > header files should be avoided. > > I don't think there is any difficulty with libxl callers #including > Xen public header files, no matter that those Xen header files have > lots of other stuff in that is not relevant to them. > > It's not as if #including the Xen public headers exposes functions for > making hypercalls, or indeed any functions or objects at all. In my repost of the series I will use the SHUTDOWN_* values from sched.h. We can always update it if consensus goes the other way. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |