[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote: > Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, > PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc"): > > On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Well, no, they can't, because their bootloader probably doesn't > > > understand anything besides what they're actually using. > > > > they only have to change the device name, not the device class > > Surely you can't steal only one minor number ? yes, that's what we do. > > > > Certainly stealing the major number for scsi disks seems quite > > > dangerous. pv-usb is hardly that unlikely a scenario. > > > > we are not doing that for pvusb > > pv-usb => usb mass storage => scsi disks I mean there is no such thing as pv-usb. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |