Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/14] Nested Virtualization: localevent

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I seem to remember we discussed the reason for this a bit some time ago. It
looked to me like you were calling a function that makes sense only on a
running guest (and a locally currently running guest at that) after the
guest was dead, during cleanup/teardown. If I'm remebering correctly then
the fix would be to not do that then. ;-)

 -- Keir

On 05/08/2010 16:46, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> The functions are called local_event_delivery* because they implicitly act
> on current. They don't need to take a vcpu parameter. If you find you need a
> vcpu parameter then you are using them, or one of their callers,
> incorrectly.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> On 05/08/2010 16:00, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel