Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 02/14] Nested Virtualization: localevent

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 10/08/2010 09:01, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Ah, this is the crux of it. You shouldn't need to stgi from the vcpu
>> destructor. It makes no sense and doing it shouldn't leave you with a
>> zombie domain.
> 
> I backed out the 'localevent' patch in my local tree, removed the stgi
> call in the vcpu destructor and run tests. A lot of things have been
> changed since the issue has been found and the real bug might have
> already been fixed in the meantime.
> 
> I haven't seen any issues with that changes in my tests so my next
> patch series I send will have the localevent patch and the stgi call
> dropped.

Thanks. I applied the p2m infrastructure patch that Tim acked, by the way.
Also may as well give Intel a little longer to respond on the common
infrastructure patches.

 -- keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel