|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: IRQs, move_in_progress, -EBUSY &c
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Looks like its callers do the same as on native Linux though -- namely > silently bail on error. I think the set_affinity type callers are pretty > benign if they fail-as-noop. In all of this, where possible I think we just > have to stay close to what Linux does. Hmm... maybe the failed affinity set is a red herring, then, as I'm seeing them also in successful boots. -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |