[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][PATCH] walking the page lists needs the page_alloc lock
At 16:09 +0100 on 12 Aug (1281629364), Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 23.07.10 at 15:49, Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There are a few places in Xen where we walk a domain's page lists > > without holding the page_alloc lock. They race with updates to the page > > lists, which are normally rare but can be quite common under PoD when > > the domain is close to its memory limit and the PoD reclaimer is busy. > > This patch protects those places by taking the page_alloc lock. > > > > I think this is OK for the two debug-key printouts - they don't run from > > irq context and look deadlock-free. The tboot change seems safe too > > While the comment says the patch would leave debug key printouts > alone, ... Sorry, my intention was to say that changes to the debug-key printouts are safe, not that they didn't require changes. The debug-key printouts (in particular the NUMA one) are where I actually hit this bug on a running system. Tim. > > unless tboot shutdown functions are called from irq context or with the > > page_alloc lock held. The p2m one is the scariest but there are already > > code paths in PoD that take the page_alloc lock with the p2m lock held > > so it's no worse than existing code. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff -r e8dbc1262f52 xen/arch/x86/domain.c > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domain.c Wed Jul 21 09:02:10 2010 +0100 > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domain.c Fri Jul 23 14:33:22 2010 +0100 > > @@ -139,12 +139,14 @@ void dump_pageframe_info(struct domain * > > ... the actual patch still touches a respective function. It would seem > to me that this part ought to be reverted. > > > } > > else > > { > > + spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock); > > page_list_for_each ( page, &d->page_list ) > > { > > printk(" DomPage %p: caf=%08lx, taf=%" PRtype_info "\n", > > _p(page_to_mfn(page)), > > page->count_info, page->u.inuse.type_info); > > } > > + spin_unlock(&d->page_alloc_lock); > > } > > > > if ( is_hvm_domain(d) ) > > @@ -152,12 +154,14 @@ void dump_pageframe_info(struct domain * > > p2m_pod_dump_data(d); > > } > > > > + spin_lock(&d->page_alloc_lock); > > page_list_for_each ( page, &d->xenpage_list ) > > { > > printk(" XenPage %p: caf=%08lx, taf=%" PRtype_info "\n", > > _p(page_to_mfn(page)), > > page->count_info, page->u.inuse.type_info); > > } > > + spin_unlock(&d->page_alloc_lock); > > } > > > > struct domain *alloc_domain_struct(void) > > Sorry for not noticing this earlier. > > Jan > -- Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |