Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2036: regressions - FAIL

[Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>]

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:22:24AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 20/08/2010 11:11, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >> Well it looks better than the previous run, and the "regressions" could be
> >> temporary networking issues in the test setup?
> > 
> > I don't think that's what's going on.  There are no other symptoms of
> > any networking problems.
> > 
> > Can we release 4.0.1 with the default kernel branch switched back ?
> 
> I dunno, maybe we should just get the main recommended pv_ops branch
> actually working. How hard can it be to fix, so that it passes what is
> frankly a featherweight series of tests.
> 

Yeah, I don't think going back to 2.6.31 is a good option.
2.6.31 is abandoned by kernel.org already.

2.6.32 is the long-term maintained kernel.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel