Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 07/14] Nested Virtualization: trap

[Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

At 04:12 +0100 on 23 Aug (1282536722), Dong, Eddie wrote:
> > 
> > If the new namespace of vmexit codes goes away entirely, that's fine
> > by me, btw.  Maybe the generic code can pass exit codes as opaque
> 
> I suggest we don't generate a new namespace for l2 exit. If the
> vmexit/ementry handler of L2 guest can go to arch specific file, we
> are mostly in same page :)

Well, since Christoph's done the work to pull out common logic I'd like
to see some of it used; but if it's going to be impossible, then we'll
start with whatever the two of you can agree on. :)

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel