[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] tmem ABI change... backwards compatibility unnecessary?

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 01.09.10 at 16:36, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I *think* it is still the case that tmem is experimental
> and is not used anywhere yet in production.  If I am
> wrong, PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP.

Well, if you call us shipping it (default disabled) in a couple of
releases "not used in production"...

> I am inclined to update the Xen tmem implementation
> to only support v1 and gracefully fail v0.

If "graceful" really means what it says, this would appear to be
acceptable irrespective of my note above.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel