| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix	WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
 
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>From: Giovanni Bellac <giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:24:54 +0000 (GMT)Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDelivery-date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:26:40 -0700Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com;	h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;	b=AiHB1qMRvVgMZXawuaVOUKRxjqzDL0yPdV0BYCciFVe4p8PKBJtEZQ0Y787F+el9wG7IPoUrGrxEnCMvfT4f64Ujhf1FAZGL0bH5+kdbbArmokeLQSD941FcRuZGjilGsXIoH31kydP8B1fFSCS6ByDS71oGZ42XB3wvTHK3jBM=;List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> 
 Hello Paul
 I am using "normal" opensource XEN 4.0.1, not XCP.
 
 I am creating the VM manually, lvcreate, manually creating .sxp and than xm create windows.xp
 
 Best regards
 Gio
 
 Von: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
 An: Giovanni Bellac <giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx>
 CC: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
 <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Gesendet: Dienstag, den 7. September 2010, 10:13:51 Uhr
 Betreff: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
 
 
Gio,      What tools are you using to create your VM? Iâm guessing
xm/xend. What happens if you use xl?      Paul    
From: Giovanni Bellac
[mailto:giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 07 September 2010 08:53
 To: Paul Durrant
 Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
    
Hello
 > Since these is actually no fe driver for vfb, I suggest you just make sure
this node does not exist.
 
 sorry, but I do not understand that 100%
 I have one domU with one LVM partition created. There is no other domU or LVM
partition on this system.
 
 Best regards
 Gio
 
   
 Von: Paul Durrant
<Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>An: Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx>; Giovanni Bellac
<giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx>
 CC: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Gesendet: Montag, den 6. September 2010, 17:45:57 Uhr
 Betreff: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
 
 The problem is that your tools are creating a /local/domain/vfb/0 node in
xenstore. The PV drivers try to gracefully close down the backend for this
using the same fe closing -> be closing -> fe closed -> be closed
state dance that it uses for vifs and this is not working.
 Since these is actually no fe driver for vfb, I suggest you just make sure this
node does not exist.
 
 Paul
 
 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel-
 > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pasi KÃrkkÃinen
 > Sent: 06 September 2010 16:31
 > To: Giovanni Bellac
 > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
 > Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
 >
 > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:23:31PM +0000, Giovanni Bellac wrote:
 > >    Hello
 > >
 > >    I have done some new tests:
 > >
 > >    - XEN 4.0.1 (self compiled, "make world") +
2.6.32.21 from
 > Jeremy
 > >    - Windows 2008 R2 64Bit
 > >    with windows PV drivers from XCP 0.5 and the regedit
change
 > from here:
 > >    [1]http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648
 > >
 > >    Same error:
 > >    ...
 > >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in
 > >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange:
 > /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state
 > >    INITIALISING; retry.
 > >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in
 > >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange:
 > /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state
 > >    INITIALISING; retry.
 > >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in
 > >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange:
 > /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state
 > >    INITIALISING; retry.
 > >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in
 > >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange:
 > /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state
 > >    INITIALISING; retry.
 > >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in
 > >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange:
 > /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state
 > >    INITIALISING; retry.
 > >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in
 > >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange:
 > /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state
 > >    INITIALISING; retry.
 > >    ...
 > >
 > >    I can not download XCP 0.1.1 to test the windows PV
drivers
 > from it,
 > >    because it is not downloadable anymore.
 > >    But I have read here in the lists, that the XCP 0.1.1
drivers
 > are not
 > >    fully signed.
 > >
 > >    So the feature
 > >
 > >    "Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV
drivers, included
 > in XCP
 > >    (Xen Cloud Platform). Xen Cloud Platform:
 > >    [2]http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html"
 > >
 > >    is not really working... :(
 > >
 >
 > Added xen-devel to CC list.. maybe someone from Citrix
 > has an idea why it doesn't work.
 >
 > -- Pasi
 >
 >
 >
 > >    Best regards
 > >    Gio
 > >
 > >   
---------------------------------------------------------------
 > -----------
 > >
 > >    Von: Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
 > >    An: Keith Coleman <list.keith@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 > >    CC: Dave Scott <Dave.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; benco
 > <benco@xxxxxxx>; Xen List
 > >    <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Mark Adams <mark@campbell-
 > lange.net>
 > >    Gesendet: Freitag, den 3. September 2010, 9:26:17 Uhr
 > >    Betreff: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-
 > certified
 > >    Windows PV drivers
 > >    On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:14:53PM -0400, Keith Coleman
wrote:
 > >    > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen
 > <[3]pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
 > >    > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Mark
Adams wrote:
 > >    > >> Xen 4.0.1 rc3, didn't change any registry
settings. Can
 > you confirm
 > >    what
 > >    > >> needs to be changed or send a link?
 > >    > >>
 > >    > >
 > >    > > It's mentioned in the xen-4.0 hg changelog:
 > >    > > [4]http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-
 > testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648
 > >    > >
 > >    >
 > >    > The signed windows drivers from XCP 0.5 are not ready
for
 > normal xen.
 > >    > Use the windows drivers from XCP 0.1.1, instead.
 > >    >
 > >
 > >    Are there some additional changes required to Xen 4.0 to
 > support XCP 0.5
 > >    winpv drivers?
 > >
 > >    -- Pasi
 > >
 > >    _______________________________________________
 > >    Xen-users mailing list
 > >    [5]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > >    [6]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 > >
 > > References
 > >
 > >    Visible links
 > >    1. http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648
 > >    2. http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html
 > >    3. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx
 > >    4. http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648
 > >    5. mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > >    6. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > Xen-devel mailing list
 > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
   
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |