[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [Linux] ia64, xencomm: fix 1028:6f7bda25a4de
KUWAMURA Shin'ya writes ("[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] [Linux] ia64, xencomm: fix 1028:6f7bda25a4de"): > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:38:50 +0100 > JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx("Jan Beulich") said: > > Even more, a few lines down in the same source file __XEN__ > > already gets #define-d, so the first choice imo would be to simply > > move that definition up. Or does this cause any *more* problems > > than the warning above (which I think needs to be dealt with > > regardless)? Jan's suggestion seems sensible. > Thank you for your advice. > > I fixed this warning by adding an #include line. I attached the patch. ... > +#include <xen/interface/xen-compat.h> > +#define __XEN_TOOLS__ Why do you choose to #define __XEN_TOOLS__ rather than __XEN__ (which latter is already defined in this file, as Jan notes) ? Does moving the definition of __XEN__ further up cause other problems ? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |