Re: [Xen-devel] Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Christian Zoffoli wrote:
> Il 29/09/2010 11:10, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
> [cut]
> > Yes, you are right.
> > A little while back I backported the whole series to 2.6.32 and the
> > result was included the Jeremy's pvops main branch, but I haven't kept
> > it completely up to date.
> > The new changes that are only in the 2.6.35-rc5-pvhvm-v7 branch regards
> > PV spinlocks, the balloon driver and the PV console.
> 
> that's a good news but in my experience the pv_ops kernel is not as
> stable as the suse xenified kernel
> ...imho the best would be to have clean patches for a 3.6.32.x vanilla
> kernel ...so we can do packages close to the official ones ...with only
> this great addition.
> 
 
I have just done a backport to 2.6.32 of the whole series, branch name
2.6.32-pvhvm; I'll try to keep it up to date.
It should be easy to rebase the series on the latest 2.6.32 stable
kernel or to apply CVE fixes on top of this branch.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel