[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: Bug#599089: linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-686: Kernel Panics when using NFS from DomU to Dom0
Where do you guys commit? I didn't see it on the kernel git tree, and can't find a debian one. Would this happen to make it into Squeeze soon? ETA? Save me the trouble of a recompile :) Cheers, Jay On 10-10-05 06:39 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: On 10/05/2010 11:22 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 09:54 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:On 10/05/2010 02:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 10:47 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:In addition to the kernel logging of the error I get this from the hypervisor: (XEN) mm.c:2062:d0 Error pfn 16d99: rd=ffff83011fefa000, od=0000000000000000, caf=180000000000000, taf=0000000000000000 (XEN) mm.c:658:d0 Could not get page ref for pfn 16d99 (XEN) mm.c:3621:d0 Could not get page for mach->phys updateAdding a bit more logging to the kernel I get: gnttb_copy_grant_page old c22ebcd8 P:0x1ec8e M:0xc499d F:0x41000000 gnttb_copy_grant_page new c2324ce0 P:0x1fe18 M:0x11cd32 F:0x40000000 (XEN) mm.c:2062:d0 Error pfn 1cd32: rd=ffff83011fefa000, od=0000000000000000, caf=180000000000000, taf=0000000000000000 (XEN) mm.c:658:d0 Could not get page ref for pfn 1cd32 (XEN) mm.c:3621:d0 Could not get page for mach->phys update Notice how MFN 0x11cd32 has become 0x1cd32 by the time it gets to the hypervisor!Oy, more of these. It might be better to use PFN_PHYS().I thought there ought to be a helper but couldn't find one, PFN_PHYS sounds like a good bet, unless we want to alias it as MFN_MACH or something?Doesn't really seem worth it, unless phys_addr_t ends up not being large enough for a machine address. But I think we rely on that pretty heavily anyway. I've committed it with that change. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |