[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 crash: "d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0000)"
Hi, Yes, probably some kernel hacking option. I have enabled these options: /boot/config-dom0 - Linux Kernel v2.6.32.24 Configuration Kernel hacking [*] Enable __must_check logic [*] Magic SysRq key -*- Debug Filesystem [*] Kernel debugging [*] Collect scheduler statistics [*] Collect kernel timers statistics [*] Compile the kernel with frame pointers [*] Sysctl checks [*] Tracers ---> [*] Support for tracing block io actions [*] Remote debugging over FireWire early on boot [*] Enable verbose x86 bootup info messages -*- Early printk [*] Early printk via EHCI debug port [*] Check for stack overflows [*] Write protect kernel read-only data structures [*] Debug boot parameters [*] Allow gcc to uninline functions marked 'inline'All the other options are disabled. So it one/some of those that need to be enabled to get the kernel booting. Let me know if you need my config-file - Valtteri Kiviniemi Jeremy Fitzhardinge kirjoitti: On 10/12/2010 01:02 PM, Valtteri Kiviniemi wrote:Hi, I just compiled Xen 4.0.0.1 with 2.6.32.24 and I stuck on this same problem with my own compiled kernel. However the default kernel with comes from "make world" boots fine. I traced the problem down to some settings in kernel's menuconfig "Kernel hacking" menu. I dont exactly know what the option needs to be enabled in the "Kernel hacking" to get the kernel booting. In my own compiled kernels I have almost all the options in that "Kernel hacking" menu disabled, and when I enabled the same options in that menu that are in the default kernel which comes when you do "make world" the system booted fine. You probably know the problem already but I just thought that I should share this information with you anyway.No, that's interesting. So some kernel debugging config option makes the problem go away? That gives me some way to possibly repro the problem. J- Valtteri Kiviniemi Jeremy Fitzhardinge kirjoitti:On 10/12/2010 01:10 AM, Andreas Kinzler wrote:On 07.10.2010 11:57, Alan J. Wylie wrote:System: Supermicro SM-SC825TQ-R720LPB, 8GB RAM Motherboard: X8DTL Processor: 1 x Intel XEON E5506 quad core RAID controller: LSI MegaRAID SAS 8708 Bisected (by hand) to between 69e50db2 (good) 2.6.32.21 "Merge commit 'v2.6.32.21' into xen/next-2.6.32" and dda56688 (bad) "Merge branch 'xen/next' into xen/next-2.6.32" ffffffff8100bd10 T get_phys_to_machine ffffffff8100bd4c t pin_pagetable_pfnI am afflicted by this problem for a long while now. Should look very familiar to you. See http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-09/msg00758.html No solution till now.Is it not fixed by current xen/stable-2.6.32.x kernels? J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |