[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pv-ops domU not working with MSI interrupts on Nehalem
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 02:12:22PM -0700, Bruce Edge wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk >> <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:52:39AM -0700, Bruce Edge wrote: >> >> One of our developers who is working on a tachyon driver is >> >> complaining that the pvops domU kernel is not working for these MSI >> >> interrupts. >> >> This is using the current head of xen/2.6.32.x on both a single >> >> Nahelam 920 and a dual E5540. This behavior is consistent with Xen >> >> 4.0.1, 4.0.2.rc1-pre and 4.1. >> > >> > >> > I just checked on my SuperMicro X8DTN, this combination >> > - For Dom0, git commit fe999249 (2.6.32.18) >> > - For DomU, devel/xen-pcifront-0.6 or devel/xen-pcifront-0.7 >> > - For Hypervisor I used cs 21976, but found that the latest (22155) works >> > too >> > >> > with which where I passed in PCI devices with legacy IRQ, MSI, and MSI-X. >> > I tried >> > a combination of doing this with IOMMU (VT-d) and without - both cases >> > these devices: >> > >> > 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI >> > Controller #1 (rev 02) >> > 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI >> > Controller #2 (rev 02) >> > 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB UHCI >> > Controller #3 (rev 02) >> > 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) USB2 EHCI >> > Controller #1 (rev 02) >> > 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82572EI Gigabit Ethernet >> > Controller (Copper) (rev 06) >> > 0a:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82575EB Gigabit Network >> > Connection (rev 02) >> > >> > worked just fine (either defining pci=["..."] or just using pci-attach). >> > >> > But if I use the latest xen/next or xen/stable-2.6.32.x it does not look >> > that happy :-( >> > >> > >> >> Konrad, >> To try eliminate the remaining differences here, could you post your >> dom0/domU config files? > > Sure. See attached Konrad, That made a big difference. Looks much better now. It's been kicked over to several developers who have each got our tachyon driver working a little bit better. Now the sticking point is an apparent limitation on the amount of memory one can request using pci_map_single. It appears that we can only ask for 256K or less. We need a 2MB DMA buffer. Is there some alternate mechanism for getting a larger physically contiguous buffer under pvops? Thanks -Bruce >> I'd like to build the same kernels to get an apples->apples comparison. >> >> Also, could you include your grub info and domU cfg file? >> >> These may eliminate some of the remaining diffs in the configs and >> show why your's works while mine does not. >> >> Thanks >> >> -Bruce > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |