[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 crash in get_phys_to_machine
at 14:45 on Fri 22-Oct-2010 Gianni Tedesco (gianni.tedesco@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 14:33 +0100, Alan J. Wylie wrote: >>> But then it looks like something is trampling max_pfn and possibly other >>> important data structures. >> I've just been reading through the Documentation/development-process >> and discovered "sparse". >> Five minutes ago I ran it on mmu.c and got the following interesting >> output: >> /usr/src/jeremy-git-xen/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:385:23: warning: symbol 'max_pfn' >> shadows an earlier one >> /usr/src/jeremy-git-xen/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h:58:22: >> originally declared here >> Is it just a co-incidence that the first two lines refer to the >> same symbol that you have just mentioned? > Hmm, sort of, I assumed I was printing the global max_pfn but it > looks like the shadowing is deliberate (if a little thoughtless in > the naming). It does reverse my finding that 'max_pfn' (the global > one) is getting corrupted. >> I'm going to try renaming the local symbol and see if things still crash. > Sadly, I'm almost certain things will still crash. You are quite right - it still crashes. >> At least I'll be able to leave it running undisturbed over the >> weekend. > This happens for you after a full boot then? No - I have an old 2.6.32.18 kernel that boots fine. -- Alan J. Wylie http://www.wylie.me.uk/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |