[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: VT-d device assignment may fail (regression from Xen c/s 19805:2f1fa2215e60)
>-----Original Message----- >From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 4:59 PM >To: Han, Weidong; Jiang, Yunhong >Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: RE: VT-d device assignment may fail (regression from Xen c/s >19805:2f1fa2215e60) > >>>> On 25.10.10 at 09:05, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx] >> What's the removed bus/devfn check you mean? I didn't catch it in the patch. > >There used to be > > if ( (secbus != bus) && (secdevfn != 0) ) > >guarding the second call to domain_context_mapping_one(). I didn't understand quite clearly of the oriignal check (the secbus!= bus && secdevfn != 0). But seems the new code should be ok, we only need setup the devfn=0 for the pcie2pci bridge, at least according to the vt-d spec. --jyh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |