[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen dom0 crash: "d0:v0: unhandled page fault (ec=0000)"
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 01:39:40PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > >> http://pastebin.com/3m0DpDdW - 2.6.32.24-gd0054d6-dirty - broken > .. snip.. > > The way is this is supposed to work is: > > > > 1. Xen gives the domain N pages > > 2. There's an E820 which describes M pages (M > N) > > 3. The kernel traverses the existing E820 and finds holes and adds > > the memory to a new E820_RAM region beyond M > > 4. Set up P2M for pages up to N > > 5. When the kernel maps all "RAM", the region from N-M is not > > present, and has no valid P2M mapping; in that case, xen_make_pte > > will return a non-present pte. > > Right, and somehow his machine/kernel is not doing this. His 'N' ends up > being 'M' so > the region N-M is added to the "RAM", and xen_make_pte I _think_ returns a > non-present pte > (or maybe it does present a present pte?) In the previous kernel (2.6.32.18), > it > does exactly what you described. Not that I am actually sure what is causing this. The interesting part is that he sees this twice: [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0x2d0699 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 [ 0.000000] last_pfn = 0x2f000 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 And he mentioned on IRC to me that this was not due to any debugging patches. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |