[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 14:38:55 +0000
Cc: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 06:40:16 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption"):
> It is calculated using the amount of free memory at boot time, assuming
> that dom0 was booted using all the memory in the system.

Perhaps it would be worth spotting if freemem_slack is very large and
issuing a warning ?  That would help spot this particular
configuration error which I suspect may become common.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

References:
- [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption
  - From: Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vif-common.sh prevent physdev match: using --physdev-out in the OUTPUT, FORWARD and POSTROUTING chains for non-bridged traffic is not supported anymore
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen on PPC Platform
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: memory consumption
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.