[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: pvops kernel branches - 2.6.36 options, stable/next/etc?
- To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:58:46 -0800
- Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:00:20 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qiiTAGzRBXEA99BqjVyt1s5614Jkd1eOngxe6/50PxrmAVeN5jRjNpqEiy63J6TW9v xydTMQZSeSKFmxS19cs9X2YFUpwjMExToy3m4/RLxozJOlH3syV//IjsPW1sqW5D3IDD 4KvFukeGdXT3EQLaRvjPj7uT9VvLccP6x45Ew=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's not a patch on konrad's stable/xen-pcifront-0.8.2 branch which was
> looking very good around the 10/21 timeframe, but which has also developed
> it's own set of instabilities recently.
Oooh, share please.
> I haven't reported any of the symptoms as I thought I'd let the dist settle
> before starting the bug reporting.
>
> Is there some other branch that developers working on PCI device drivers in
> a pvops domU should be following?
Well, I am working on a PCI E820 hole thingie, If this for the 4GB mem limit on pvops domUs?
but those patches are in the
infancy period. There are some fixes:
stable/xen-pcifront-fixes
but they aren't that .. sophisticated.
>
> I realize that we're tracking unstable trees, but it's either that or hvm.
> We'd like to stick with the benefits that pvops provides, but I'm running
> out of branches to try.
>
> The last stable domU I built was:
> git:// git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git -
> stable/xen-pcifront-0.8.2
> 8029255fcc3a7925ad8ee9f5fdc0764b6662301e
Hmm, so the difference between that and the upstream is the PVonHVM and
the initial domain 0 support (all in Stefano's tree).
I tried disabling the CONFIG_XEN_PVHVM with no change. (see the "2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request" thread.
Is that sufficient to eliminate the PnonHVM from the equation?
-Bruce
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|