[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-devel] A patch to xen/arch/x86/hvm/pmtimer.c for both Xen 4.0.0 and Xen 4.0.1 to improve HVM scalability


  • To: Song Xiang <classicxsong@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:51:25 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Haibo Chen <oldseawave@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:52:24 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:x-priority:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=CoF6ncO4Jt3DwrkFS94HOTLIAhgHqknUfz2t6b1OSIplIaPyar2DCBWFZ74eK88Fjm 6gr2oQddsakWmA5p/GnI1eX8VRnpk7jaLlxPHaM+7r6rER7Xq4jIJx6QIqsbVayCM9zt H1k1c9jlsFH++BnKoga7Iah1CU08/YGW31EiE=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcuFYq8HP2d0+S9n6E2w/J/+Qy/AKwAAGJaf
  • Thread-topic: [SPAM] Re: [Xen-devel] A patch to xen/arch/x86/hvm/pmtimer.c for both Xen 4.0.0 and Xen 4.0.1 to improve HVM scalability

On 16/11/2010 07:48, "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Anyway, please modify your patch as I suggest above, and then also confirm
> what speedups you get with the revised patch. I want to know what the wins
> are before applying optimisation hacks. I don't particularly have an issue
> with them as long as they work! :-)

Oh, also, if your patch is intended to be applied straight away, you also
need to always provide a suitable patch description and Signed-off-by
line(s) directly above the patch in your email. Otherwise I tend to silently
ignore the email.

 -- Keir

>  -- Keir
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.