[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request


  • To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:42:54 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:49:18 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=595g4TOe7H6lU85zF7kLaKENzO2tT8kpi1BdQz+KH6m5d/i80IGMLlXVP/7Lp1wgP0y8ldJgsKMpTa7sqyI1/5pNY4GJQ6YRgw9yJ0hUt4ceHSxm7Ev/obOXR2dt7CeCtxZaRN0usSVBnWE3vIf8RCv3FirUyqmDRxOxsQoqT0M=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

> So what I think you are saying is that you keep on getting the bug in DomU?
> Is the stack-trace the same as in rc1?

Yes.
When i want to get 1-2 hr of stable work :-

# service network restart
# service nfs restart

at Dom0.

I also believe that presence of xen-pcifront.fix.patch is making things much more stable
on F14.

Boris.

--- On Tue, 11/16/10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: 2.6.37-rc1 mainline domU - BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Bruce Edge" <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, November 16, 2010, 4:15 PM

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:43:28PM -0800, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> > Huh. I .. what? I am confused. I thought we established that the issue
> > was not related to Xen PCI front? You also seem to uncomment the
> > upstream.core.patches and the xen.pvhvm.patch - why?
>
> I cannot uncomment upstream.core.patches and the xen.pvhvm.patch
> it gives failed HUNKs

Uhh.. I am even more confused.
>
> > Ok, they are.. v2.6.37-rc2 which came out today has the fixes
>
> I am pretty sure rc2 doesn't contain everything from xen.next-2.6.37.patch,
> gntdev's stuff for sure. I've built 2.6.37-rc2 kernel rpms and loaded
> kernel-2.6.27-rc2.git0.xendom0.x86_64 under Xen 4.0.1.
> Device /dev/xen/gntdev has not been created. I understand that it's
> unrelated to DomU ( related to Dom0) , but once again with rc2 in DomU i cannot
> get 3.2 GB copied over to DomU from NFS share at Dom0.

So what I think you are saying is that you keep on getting the bug in DomU?
Is the stack-trace the same as in rc1?


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.