[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?

To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:50:48 +0000
Cc: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:51:56 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Stefano posted a pure userspace blkback for qemu only yesterday. Apparently
> it performs very well.

I am waiting for upstream qemu to work with xen before doing any
benchmarks, because upstream qemu has a far better aio implementation
than the current qemu-xen.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH 2 of 4] xc: split xc non-upstream bindings into xcext module
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/13] Nested Virtualization: core
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.