Re: [Xen-devel] bogus gfn - mfn - gfn - mfn checks in guest_physmap_add_entry

[Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 24, Olaf Hering wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 24, Tim Deegan wrote:

> > Another option would be to audit all callers of p2m_is_ram() and check
> > whether they can handle paged-out PFNs (which I though had already been
> > done but seems not to be).  Keir's VCPU yield patch might be useful in
> > some of those places too.
> 
> I think most if not all is caught by my changes already.

A quick grep shows there are a few places that need an audit wether or
not the paging types can be removed from p2m_is_ram().

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel