[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-pv
Ian Jackson writes ("[xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-pv"): > *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** ... > x86: fixes after emuirq changes This is a lie too I'm afraid. The allegation is that it leaked a process, but the process it leaked was root 26506 1 0 08:36 ttyS0 00:00:00 /sbin/getty -L ttyS0 115200 vt102 I will arrange for gettys to be ignored. I'll think about having the bisector do a few more before/after runs to decrease the probability that spurious failures will be pinned on specific changesets. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |