[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4] Support new xl command cpupool-numa-split


  • To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:31:50 +0000
  • Cc: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:32:48 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=HFsP7BzSDE3PmJ18QmPaD1Y+3TAd9P3lGhezkktH53fxez0v/il/7p0CtHjB3pkaEU fLbvy60DgGZALsLnPQta3mbtZKRxwtVbGrWWru0i6oMmaDz9yCtC5sQsSc+EzrcKvr/f 9vzIP5edZ2VQ8RUqhHoG1swAp5kBKRyT8C3uY=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 4 of 4] Support new xl command 
> cpupool-numa-split"):
>> New xl command cpupool-numa-split which will create one cpupool for each
>> numa node of the machine. Can be called only if no other cpupools than Pool-0
>> are defined. After creation the cpupools can be managed as usual.
>
> Interesting.   Is this a usual use case ?  I don't object to the feature.

it's the default configuration you get if you don't manually muck
about with cpupools.  Sounds like a pretty useful shortcut, rather
than having to parse node info manually.  (Haven't looked at the code
yet.)

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.