[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] amd iommu: Large io page support - implementation
Hi, At 18:00 +0000 on 07 Dec (1291744845), Keir Fraser wrote: > Cc'ing Tim -- he could advise how plausible it is to find other available > bits to move the p2m types to. PAE Xen we need to use bits 9-11 because there are no other bits available. On 64-bit we could just shift all the type bits up by three; I think there's plenty of space above bit 52 for all the types we need. Even on PAE we really only need to store a p2m type in leaf nodes (l1 entries and superpage entries) so bits 9-11 are free on internal nodes. I don't understand why the iommu tables have a level stored in every entry, though - is that a hardware requirement? > Also I'm not sure whether the p2m tables ever > get used as host pagetables these days (e.g., when guest has CR0.PG=0). That > could affect how difficult it is to mess with the p2m format. They never get used for PG=0 any more, we have a page in the firmware with a 1-1 4GB mapping instead. But they do get used as pagetables in order to use a linear mapping to read the p2m quickly. > If it's possible, though, it's probably worth pursuing. Sharing the tables > uses less memory, and could be less complicated code too. Yep, sounds like a great idea. Cheers, Tim. > On 07/12/2010 11:20, "Wei Wang2" <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Allen, > > Actually, each amd iommu pde entry uses bit 9-11 to encode next page table > > level, but these bits are also used as AVL bits by p2m table to encode > > different page types...So, it might not be quite easy to share NPT table > > with > > amd iommu unless we change p2m table encoding for this first. > > Thanks, > > Wei > > > > On Tuesday 07 December 2010 01:47:22 Kay, Allen M wrote: > >> Hi Wei, > >> > >> My understanding is that both EPT/NPT already supports 2M and 1G page > >> sizes. If this is true and if NPT supports the same page table format as > >> AMD iommu, shouldn't iommu 2M and 1G support just a matter of pointing > >> iommu page table pointer to NPT page table of the same guest OS thus > >> sharing the same page table between NPT and AMD iommu? > >> > >> This should save a lot code changes in iommu code. We just need to flush > >> iommu page table in IOTLB at appropriate places. > >> > >> Allen > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wei Wang2 Sent: > >> Friday, December 03, 2010 8:04 AM > >> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 4/4] amd iommu: Large io page support - > >> implementation > >> > >> This is the implementation. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> We > >> Signed-off-by: Wei Wang <wei.wang2@xxxxxxx> > >> -- > >> Legal Information: > >> Advanced Micro Devices GmbH > >> Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, > >> Landkreis München Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632 > >> Geschäftsführer: > >> Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > -- Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team Citrix Systems UK Ltd. (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |