[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: common time reference between domU and dom0


  • To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>, James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:45:39 +0000
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:52:54 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PCuK3kCcUadSkr7NpweRILayHIaEXt1ANAY81aglMdakE+GYpirUuAcUyS8X7TIhb7 erML34joXn/dMpmPdKIHZ25SzP1nIs5cSBBvVKaW7YO1mVwgfJ1p6WxL3QzHOjx60aL3 QUFVVMvBTi00f07c2b4/8CGxRA7Vzv08H0tBo=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcuYV2Jck6tqERvW9UamVutoApgdYg==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: common time reference between domU and dom0

On 10/12/2010 10:22, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 12/10/2010 11:20 AM, James Harper wrote:
>> Is that a new call? I don't see it mentioned in 4.0-testing anywhere.
>> 
>> Is there a fallback if HVMOP_get_time doesn't exist?
> 
> Not really, but it is really an easy backport to your hypervisor.  It
> will even be in RHEL5.6/CentOS 5.6.

It's probably worth backporting for 4.0.2 too.

 -- Keir

> Paolo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.