[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: "Device model is a stubdom" is not an error

To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:32:24 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:33:15 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: "Device model is a stubdom" is 
not an error"):
> libxl: "Device model is a stubdom" is not an error.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied, thanks.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: "Device model is a stubdom" is not an error
  - From: Ian Campbell

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: correct bounce direction for debug-key handling
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: "Device model is a stubdom" is not an error
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: NetBSD: implement xc_evtchn_bind_unbound_port
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.