[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] qemu VS tapdisk2 VS blkback benchmarks
- To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:16:38 -0800
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 12:17:30 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=RqgkzdBcj3Fu3HprQk+ND8OYA7n4DjmRdA+xKDa+Tgpadf22B4kxT76tldMJ37TSuw /4J3LN3LwXi1WPdHkWUQFKxPMI3zvYmCsFFK56eLmfLAl+xTbzDIqLPDA9IXhKucPap7 E1LzAQdFRW1g7gNjVObgb3IZMq7NDaX1HjBQQ=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
I am assuming when you said "blkback over lvm", you
used "phy:/dev/..." format.
do you have any figures on tapdisk2 over lvm?
[wherein you would use "tap2:aio:/dev/..." ]
shriram
--
perception is but an offspring of its own self
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
