[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Compile pvops kernel xen/stable-2.6.32.x error


  • To: Kevin.Buckley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:24:20 +0800
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:32:03 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=lxjmJ6+eHmM0x4NN2akWtLj4rE0KHqEju6ucrIxBRFVr8DKWfF7DUeFq1U4fLfF6kO l8sCRUMBuGLJiR6JexhcLzOIzr7l3dzCig9126rosEsYyx7UlH9MnuowbmD+NK+AvSiF 5/Ny7fSTShMHzbzLS5TRqRxdpZFJzM7mVDqqU=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>



On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 5:15 AM, <Kevin.Buckley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> Thanks for sharing... ...
>
> > for me, the error messages are effectively toggled if one either
> > defines (see errors) or does not define (no errors) the kernel
> > config value:
> >
> > CONFIG_DEBUG_FORCE_WEAK_PER_CPU
>
> What do you mean either define or not define?  Do you mean when the above
> option is enabled or set to y the compilation will fail and errors are
> what I posted previously in that thread?  If that is so, I will have
> doubt...

Yep, that's what I saw.

If I have that option checked I get the compilation errors you detailed.

If the only change I make to the failing config is to uncheck that
option, and then recompile, I don't.

Thanks for your confirmation ;)

Good to know what to avoid when playing with custom kernel compilation... ...

Kindest regards,
Giam Teck Choon

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.