[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.1 "xc_map_foreign_batch: mmap failed: Cannot allocate memory"


  • To: Charles Arnold <carnold@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:54:24 +0000
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:55:26 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=xDD+BpZ3PCpgR7JXucgzcu5v3lhLLHAjVOuLvU7P2qVbI+suE2q3bQ7r/AMnCsR3zZ NPZSwt8eHhxyhIjDiV1JDWhLnjhUdGE9+jMIT9cZJnDUB06g/El5gA4vLpqbFmnYuP3G xHV1Qcq/dOo2EpZAiOfhQKVBxhFwXpdBJfMxs=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcudY2tvfL1Lem6yk0OmgM61zs4F/A==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.1 "xc_map_foreign_batch: mmap failed: Cannot allocate memory"

On 16/12/2010 20:44, "Charles Arnold" <carnold@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>> On 12/16/2010 at 01:33 PM, in message <C9302813.2966F%keir@xxxxxxx>, Keir
> Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 16/12/2010 19:23, "Charles Arnold" <carnold@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> The bug is that qemu-dm seems to make the assumption that it can mmap from
>>> dom0 all the memory with which the guest has been defined instead of the
>>> memory
>>> that is actually available on the host.
>> 
>> 32-bit dom0? Hm, I thought the qemu mapcache was supposed to limit the total
>> amount of guest memory mapped at one time, for a 32-bit qemu. For 64-bit
>> qemu I wouldn't expect to find a limit as low as 3.25G.
> 
> Sorry, I should have specified that it is a 64 bit dom0 / hypervisor.

Okay, well I'm not sure what limit qemu-dm is hitting then. Mapping 3.25G of
guest memory will only require a few megabytes of pagetables for the qemu
process in dom0. Perhaps there is a ulimit or something set on the qemu
process?

If we can work out and detect this limit, perhaps 64-bit qemu-dm could have
a mapping cache similar to 32-bit qemu-dm, limited to some fraction of the
detected mapping limit. And/or, on mapping failure, we could reclaim
resources by simply zapping the existing cached mappings. Seems there's a
few options. I don't really maintain qemu-dm myself -- you might get some
help from Ian Jackson, Stefano, or Anthony Perard if you need more advice.

 -- Keir

> - Charles
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.