[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] Intel S3420GPLX VT-d VF question
Can you attach some logs by dmesg in your guest just after *igbvf* module inserted? Which vf(s) or BDF did you passed to guest? 0000:04:10.4? So have you ever checked the physical ports in your card? If you the card takes two ports, generally, one is for odd and the other is for even function of the BDF. Best Regards Zhuo Song Gif me a visky, ginger ale on the side. --------- On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 22:18:45 -0500, "Michael A. Collins" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 12:50:35 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Take your time. > > Seems as the igb module was loaded in the initramfs and was not > reloaded using the options specified in my igb.conf file under > /etc/modprobe.d. I rmmod igb and did a modprobe igb max_vfs=7 and > suddenly all the Virtual Functions showed up. So that was the > problem > all along. Until I figure out how to edit the initramfs to load igb > with max_vfs option, I'm putting the rmmod and modprobe in the > rc.local file, that seems to work well and it gets executed before > xend. I am build xen-4.0-testing to replace the rpms I used. Once > all that is done and I test passing through one of the Virtual > Functions to a vm, I'll report back. > Mike Ok, so I can pass one of the virtual functions through to a HVM. I think I'm still not out of the water though. It's acting very strangely and I have not successfully been able to very layer-2 connectivity with it. I am seeing the following in my HVM's qemu log: register_real_device: Assigning real physical device 04:10.4 ... pt_dev_is_virtfn: 0000:04:10.4 is a SR-IOV Virtual Function pt_iomul_init: Error: pt_iomul_init can't open file /dev/xen/pci_iomul: No such file or directory: 0x4:0x10.0x4 pt_register_regions: IO region registered (size=0x00004000 base_addr=0xb2448004) pt_register_regions: IO region registered (size=0x00004000 base_addr=0xb2468004) pt_msix_init: get MSI-X table bar base b2468000 pt_msix_init: table_off = 0, total_entries = 3 pt_msix_init: errno = 2 pt_msix_init: mapping physical MSI-X table to 7fe3c4359000 register_real_device: Real physical device 04:10.4 registered successfuly! IRQ type = INTx generate a sci for PHP. deassert due to disable GPE bit. pt_pci_write_config: Warning: Guest attempt to set address to unused Base Address Register. [00:06.0][Offset:30h][Length:4] pt_iomem_map: e_phys=20000000 maddr=b2448000 type=0 len=16384 index=0 first_map=1 pt_iomem_map: e_phys=20004000 maddr=b2468000 type=0 len=16384 index=3 first_map=1 Now, I never see a pt_msi_setup: msi mapped with pirq XX line, which leads me to believe that the pass through isn't actually working. I am still using the mayoung built xen-4.0.1-6 rpms from koji, since I have not been able to successfully compile xen stubdom. I guess gcc 4.5 is just too new and untested for me to troubleshoot and get through. Hopefully, someone on here can point me in the right direction. Mike _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |