[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.37 dom0 non-fatal BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:85


  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:47:33 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 10:49:06 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DmOOgjq3fW5DVvf6AeXF/tGLaaVM6ZUrcdNDRZGuocYJrgT7vzmoRK6DPZwKxoVxlHV9QUny6m6j0JF37HK/kF0bxtwjVwCL2bn7YdNtZ1+BJxz6DnGuxLSkoj6RouyYYpbS4N40lqsPzf+9SDinyf7fBZJzaSGZCWXiXSzwXOk=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>I tested using some 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 kernels.
> -Gerry

Would suggest to try the most recent 2.6.32.27 pvops via Jeremy Git Repos

Boris.

--- On Thu, 1/6/11, Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Gerry Reno <greno@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.37 dom0 non-fatal BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/mutex.c:85
To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thursday, January 6, 2011, 1:12 PM

On 01/06/2011 01:00 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:50:16PM -0500, Gerry Reno wrote:
>   
>> On 01/06/2011 12:42 PM, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
>>     
>>> In response to Michael Young post fedora-xen list :-
>>>
>>>       
>>>> There is a 2.6.37 kernel to test (2.6.37-1.xendom0.fc15)
>>>>         
>>> Works for me under Xen 4.0.1 , but attempt to "startx" causes stack trace.
>>> Works as vanilla as well . Allows to run KVMs been built with standard
>>> fedora kernel.
>>>
>>> Boris.
>>>
>>>       
>> Haven't tried 2.6.37 yet but I have not been able to get X running with
>> any of the dom0 kernels while using Ubuntu Lucid.  I've always gotten a
>> stack trace.
>>
>>     
> Which kernels did you try?
> Can you post the stack trace?
>
> -- Pasi
>   

I'm using this machine currently so I can't reboot it to get a stack
trace.  Too much work open.  It's probably the same stack trace that
Boris got.
I tested using some 2.6.31 and 2.6.32 kernels.

-Gerry


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.